Fixed
Status Update
Comments
ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #2
[Monorail components: ESC]
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #3
[Monorail components: -Community]
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #4
I propose to first work on figuring the entry criteria out (https://crbug.com/gerrit/11635 ).
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #5
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #6
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #7
@Marco @Edwin this issue is associated to the ESC.
What type of engagement are you expecting from us? Propose a process?
What type of engagement are you expecting from us? Propose a process?
ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #8
We (community managers) can take care to define/describe a process, but we would like to get input from you on the criteria that should be used to make such a decision.
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #9
@Edwin, thanks for the clarification. I'll put an entry in the agenda of the next ESC meeting.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #10
Thanks @Luca. I then set you as Owner, accordingly, until a CM can (based on that ESC input).
[Monorail components: Community]
[Monorail components: Community]
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #11
Thanks @Marco, I'm good in taking ownership on this task and present and discuss with the ESC
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #12
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #13
How is this blocking 11819 if that is closed?
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #14
Indeed; removed.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #16
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
bu...@chops-service-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com <bu...@chops-service-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> #18
The following revision refers to this bug:
https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit.git/+/a4a11bb2228897ff4dd5836ab7b9ac27eaa65dc8
commit a4a11bb2228897ff4dd5836ab7b9ac27eaa65dc8
Author: Luca Milanesio <luca.milanesio@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 11:54:35 2020
Add a process to remove a core plugin
The technical criteria for removing a core plugin
is the exact opposite of the one for adding a core
plugin.
Even though it was quite obvious, it has been explicitly
requested to be documented.
Bug:https://crbug.com/gerrit/11637
Change-Id: I5e067310bcdcdc84dfb6754d2f0796ffb7e451b9
[modify]https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit.git/+/a4a11bb2228897ff4dd5836ab7b9ac27eaa65dc8/Documentation/dev-core-plugins.txt
commit a4a11bb2228897ff4dd5836ab7b9ac27eaa65dc8
Author: Luca Milanesio <luca.milanesio@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 11:54:35 2020
Add a process to remove a core plugin
The technical criteria for removing a core plugin
is the exact opposite of the one for adding a core
plugin.
Even though it was quite obvious, it has been explicitly
requested to be documented.
Bug:
Change-Id: I5e067310bcdcdc84dfb6754d2f0796ffb7e451b9
[modify]
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #19
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #20
[Monorail components: SteeringCommittee]
ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #21
[Monorail components: -ESC]
ek...@google.com <ek...@google.com> #22
[Empty comment from Monorail migration]
is...@google.com <is...@google.com> #23
Edits were made to reflect the following in Monorail: auto-CCs.
Description